Archives > Opinion > Letters

Print | | Comment (1 comment(s)) | Rate | Text Size

No synthesis here


Published: Wednesday, March 3, 2010 1:35 PM CST
The principle that an "idea or event (thesis) generates its opposite (antithesis) leading to a reconciliation of opposites (synthesis)" is attributed to Hegel. If we look at the last 75 years of American history through this lens (known as the dialectic) then the New Deal/Great Society era appears as thesis which inevitably generated its antithesis in the guise of Laissez-faire/"Reaganomics".

And, thus far in his administration, Obama seems determined to effect a synthesis in the Hegelian sense of "a unified whole in which opposites are reconciled." That at least seems to have been the theory. The practice, however, has not led to anything remotely resembling sythesis.

Conservative ideas incorporated into progressive legislation have produced a dilution rather than a melding, antilogy as opposed to synergy.

To date we've seen attempts to restrict a woman's access to health care inserted into a bill to provide access to health care, we've seen tax cuts, which studies have shown are not particularly stimulative, included in a stimulus package, and we looked on in disbelief as Republicans demanded that the development of a new "modern (nuclear) warhead" be made part of any nuclear disarmament treaty!


This last especially should dispel any remaining hopes Obama may have had for reconciliation (in the dialectical, not the parliamentary sense). Whatever comes out of this polarized process will not be a synthesis.

Mike Gruetzemacher

Cochise



Previous  
'Our Towns' enjoyed  

Article Rating

Current Rating: 0 of 0 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of willcoxrangenews.com.

FrankieLee wrote on Mar 6, 2010 12:04 AM:

" Where did you go college? The University of Marx? Hegel, Lenin, Marx and the johnny come lately Alinsky, all are of the same ilk. If you can't win the arguement with facts then baffle them with B.S. Doesn't that more or less sum up Hagel's methods? Why didn't you throw "social justice" into your litlte essay for good measure to show what a good little "progressive" you really are. An elementary school boy's attempt at being an intellectual. Just another Statist trying to peddle the Left's poison, thinly disguised as a rational commentary. It was and contines to be progressive legislative policy that is the problem. The abortion issue is a smoke screen, you moron, and if you understood anything about the issue you would know that the problem with abortion is that it shouldn't be a part of the constitution and forced on the states. Whether or not you agree with a woman's so called "right to choose" isn't the issue. It's a states rights issue. Barack is going to force legislation on this country because he wants it. I don't think you even understand the kind of man that you support and what he is selling. You would be right at home in Cuba or Venezuela. Just another useful idiot of the Left. Good luck on that. Facts don't mean anything to your type you're too far gone to reason with so I find it much more productive to ridicule. With your type it is far more constructive and way less frustrating. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
We will not post comments that we know to be factually inaccurate, nor will we post personal attacks.
(optional)
   
Return to: Letters « | Home « | Top of Page ^

Willcox, AZ


Sponsored by: